I don’t think you are tripping. Get one of those youtube pedo hunters on it.
On this instance too: https://exploding-heads.com/post/708588
Some cultures don’t have the forced artificially extended childhood we call “adolescence”. It’s something we invented. Something we choose to do. We can stop this cruelty any time.
Yikes. Can instance admins see who upvoted? See if those accounts that did was created at around the same time, because that doesn’t seem organic to me.
1500 is pretty aggressive at that weight, if you’re an average height male at 300lbs you can eat 2300kcal and still lose like 2 lbs a week. You don’t want to starve yourself, if you want to be aggressive, eat 2100 (700kcal deficite, recommended is 500kcal). Adjust every other week or so.
Calculate your BMR here, and look at the table depending on your exercise level: https://www.calculator.net/bmr-calculator.html?ctype=standard&cage=25&csex=m&cheightfeet=5&cheightinch=10&cpound=300&cheightmeter=180&ckg=60&cmop=0&coutunit=c&cformula=m&cfatpct=20&x=22&y=20
There’s no way this is real, right… Right?
EDIT:
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday signed a law that would give judges a say on whether to list someone as a sex offender for having oral or anal sex with a minor.
The bill would expand the discretion currently granted judges in statutory rape cases and was promoted as bringing fairness under the law to LGBTQ defendants.
The current law, in place for decades, permits judges to decide whether a man should be placed on California’s sex offender registry if he had voluntary intercourse with someone 14 to 17 years old and was no more than 10 years older than the person.
But that discretion only applied to a man who had vaginal intercourse. The new change permits judges to use that >same discretion when the case involves voluntary oral or anal sex.
OMFG. Why would it even be an option not to put pedos on the registry?
Yeah, those people are almost always young men/boys. The family can then use his residency status to get in themselves. We call them “anchor babies” over here. Also, human smuggler aren’t cheap, these families aren’t poor because then they couldn’t pay the smugglers.
The only solution is to wait until they are confirmed to be over 18 and then send them home. If they are actually a child, keep them until they turn 18 and send them back.
“You’d struggle to find a famous sex scene where a woman’s pubic hair has been featured.”
Yeah, and how many are there featuring a man’s pubic hair?
“pubic hair has become so taboo that if women don’t hide it, it is seen as a form of “self-expression,” and a “radical act.””
I wonder if I as a man does the same thing the same is true.
“Pubic hair maintenance has historically been recommended by beauty outlets with keeping a sexual partner interested in mind or mimicking the look of mainstream pornographic actors,” she said.
Wait a minute, I thought women didn’t shave, wear make-up and dressed sexy for men, but for themselves??? /S
What switch?