• 0 Posts
  • 17 Comments
Joined 1Y ago
cake
Cake day: Jun 09, 2023

help-circle
rss

I think that’s settled - that would not even be an option.

Which is why I was confused with you said “while the rest of the lands are ceded back to the Ukraine” since Crimeia is still contested.

The Leopards did not have the desired effect. The main lines were not penetrated, and there does not seem to be any chance that the counteroffensive makes a significant gain.

Which is what Putin and you think. I won’t be able to convince you that a few burnt-out Leapards doesn’t mean NATO equipment is useless. There’s a typical cycle that Russian media views any new acquisition as incredibly provocative and escalates the war before it is sent, then nothing at all and offers no new capabilities once it is delivered. For example, do you think F16s would be a huge capability for Ukraine? I do, but once they are delivered in a few months or years, I’m sure Russia will say they’re nothing new.

Ukraine is trying to do the hardest thing an army can do, break through heavily entrenched enemy lines without air superiority. We’ll see if the offensive will end up achieving a lot or a little, but it has already been infinitely more effective than Russia’s ‘winter offensive.’ I’d recommend William Spatnel’s game theory analysis videos for the bargaining and strategic analysis and Perun’s videos for more in-depth on what capabilities which systems offer Ukraine and Russia.


So Ukrane would get Crimea?

There are costs to continuing conflict, but because of sustained increasing Ukrainian technology and training, it will shift more rather than less to their favor. But Putin likely thinks more like you do, which is why they continue to fight even though omniscient lines on maps would suggest they have alternatives mutually preferable to war.


Depends what you use as your scale of left and right. And that left right sliding scale isn’t terribly useful either. How far left you view something is more relative to your own position rather than absolute. There are a lot of places that accept genuine discussion, just not bad faith arguments and particularly vile speech. What were you trying to say that got shut down?


I’ve only looked though the last couple of days and haven’t seen anything helpful. I don’t really want to dive deeper into your post history because it looks quite vile at a glance


Do you think exploding-heads.com is an echo chamber? It seems like an absolute free speech haven would attract people banned from everywhere else, bringing togethe extreme viewpoints without any moderate or opposing views, causing an echo chamber





He wants to get rid of downvotes entirely to spare his fragile ego



Isn’t that silencing free speech? I’m downvoting y’all and I’m from sh.itjust.works


I think that’s a part of most all ideologies apart from the ones billionaires hold. For example, communists would agree. Historical fascists also would agree since they often nationalized big businesses rather than being controlled by them


His answer was that he’d somehow end it in the first day in office. Since he can’t cause Ukraine to make gains in one day, that means he’ll force them to make major concessions to Russia by threatening to withhold support to Ukraine. So he’d essentially end the war by letting Russia win, at least partially.


The Pentagon was using the replacement cost rather than the more accurate current value, that’s where the discrepancy comes from. The money itself is mostly in equipment, which we can see being used on the front lines


I’m really confused. So two guys are competing, but one of them becomes a gal to complete the other guy? But that way of saying trans (is it a slur?) is usually derogatory? Is the bottom text another set up and subversion, or is it just anti trans? I don’t get it


Frankly I just wanted to know if I should block the community. I’ll leave it for now I guess